The Legacy of Lehman

Ask anyone who survived the Great Depression what that time was like and they’ll shutter at the thought of revisiting that horrible experience. The scars have lasted their entire lifetimes, leaving an indelible mark on their psyche along with a healthy dose of skepticism about Wall Street and its merits to society as a whole. From the “Roaring Twenties” to begging for work or food, that must have been truly terrifying ordeal. For those fortunate to get back on their feet, it meant you’d never spend more than you made and would have an emergency account, that might better be described as a “rainy decade fund.” But as time passed and the post war boom brought wealth and opportunity as far as the eye could see, second and third generations forgot what it meant to experience a full-fledged banking crisis. After 80 years the memories of those dark days became but a footnote in the history books. Sure, there was the savings and loan crisis for those historians and the Resolution Trust bailout, but these were mainly small institutions with a focus on mortgage lending, many of which would be referred to as credit unions today. The economy’s firm footing along with their thrifts modest role in the financial system as a whole allowed this process to unfold without a real systemic impact. 



Then came 2007, when two credit based hedge funds run by Bear Stearns collapsed it had been attributed to ill time wagers unique to the firm, but by the following Spring when regulators had to force an unholy union between the investment bank and JP Morgan, it became clear this was not an idiosyncratic situation. The next several months brought extraordinary volatility and angst to the markets. Then on September 15, 2008 Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy followed shortly thereafter by Washington Mutual going into receivership jarring the collective conscious of Wall Street and Main Street alike. Many of us remember Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson pleading with Congress to enact emergency measures like TARP to stem the tide. There was a time there when it very much seemed touch and go and that we were on the brink of a calamity that would set us back a generation or two. The combination of an aggressive policy response along with incredible resolve would see us slog through, but it would take nearly a decade to heal from the damage, real and perceived even if the markets had recovered by 2013.


I can’t fault anyone from assuming the worst, the memories are still too fresh. But let’s be clear about something, Silicon Valley Bank is no Lehman Brothers; they are not one of the most venerable investment banks run by some of the “smartest people” in the world, whose massive leverage tied to worthless collateral wiped out their equity and resulted in paper losses for all of us in the trillions. When talks of “credit default swaps” became common at the dinner table and executives from Countrywide never saw the inside of a jail cell, it seemed like we were just pawns in a massive casino rigged for select few. As markets wobbled, unemployment and foreclosures spiked, the two decades of profound prosperity were over in a blink. So here we are in 2023, and we are talking about the shuttering of the second largest bank ever. It is perfectly understandable to be outraged by the failure of a large financial institution and to be a little scared by all this, after all it wasn’t supposed to happen again. It also begs the question who also made be capable of such mismanagement, but I’d ask you to step back for a moment to allow the facts to play out before we make hasty decisions we may end up regretting.


By now most of us have read about what got the bank in trouble, so I’ll spare you the two or three paragraphs detailing their business, the risks associated with that approach and the fact their situation was rather unique in many respects. This was levered P/E firm masquerading as a bank. As they touted their intellectual expertise and vast networks to the venture capital illuminati, the price to pay to play was “all” of your money being held at the bank. When their balances ballooned during the speculative excess of 2020 & 2021 they were outright flush with cash. In the end it boils down to the fact that they felt compelled to buy longer dated securities to drive a higher portfolio return with the coffers full Perhaps their reasoning was that interest rates would go up, but the process would be slow and orderly so why not extend duration, after all central bankers said rates wouldn’t be that much higher in the future. That turned out to a fatal mistake as those securities were forced to be marked down sharply when interest rates jumped as high as they did over the last 12 months during the most aggressive tightening cycle. If on paper alone the decline in value may have been manageable but their loyal customers were no longer so loyal and SIVB was forced to sell those securities when met with massive depositor redemptions. Compounding the matter, in an attempt to shore up their balance sheet after incurring the aforementioned loss of about $2BB, they were unable to raise additional funds through an equity offering further shaking investor confidence. As the stock price wavered and the news spread, the run was on and the death spiral was a forgone conclusion, insolvent they were forced into receivership. The investment process deployed is not unique to SIVB, it was just not managed properly. You very well may have heard the old quip “3-6-3” in your travels, where the bank executive pays 3% interest on deposits, lends money out at 6% so that he can be on the golf course by 3PM. That’s a bit simplistic but not too far off how the banking business works, or other financial firms operate for that matter. The Oracle of Omaha himself, Warren Buffett, talks about how his similar approach with the massive insurance business Geico, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway gives him access to capital with very favorable terms. Eventually he will need to return the capital, but in the interim if he can make a healthy return on the collected premiums before funds are returned to policyholders as claims paid, then he has done his job well. Most financial firms, especially the larger ones are diversified businesses with multiple lines of revenue, not simply relying on net interest margin as outlined above. They also have much more disciplined asset management departments and are more heavily scrutinized by regulators so the risk of contagion here is really quite small. What is important is that we avert a crisis in confidence versus an actual banking crisis, it will be our own undoing if we don’t simply allow things to calm down a bit. 


One last note, I’d call your attention to the sizable regulatory response, the Fed and Treasury have backstopped all depositors at least temporarily discarding the cap on deposit insurance which had been raised from $100K to $250K back during the financial crisis. Whether you have $300K or $300MM on deposit the money will be there for you. Look for the deposit insurance amount to be permanently increased again once the dust settles. Separately the Fed has created a mechanism that allows banks to post as collateral assets based on par value (the value at maturity) even if those assets would command a lower price if sold into the market today as interest rates have gone up since they were acquired. This means that banks should not need to raise additional capital which would be dilutive to shareholders and it should also mean that depositors shouldn’t feel compelled to run to their banks to spread there assets around amongst a number of institutions as they are all basically following the same script. 


In closing, on Sunday September 14th, 2008 I was at Yankee game with my father, for as long as I can remember he and I have been taking in different ballparks as a special way to bond overall our mutual love of baseball. This was his first time at the Stadium, you may recall that was the final season in the original “House That Ruth Built” as he dutifully filled the scorecard in the program, I kept checking my phone hoping the Treasury would orchestrate a miracle and find Lehman Brothers a partner to prevent the inevitable fallout should they file for bankruptcy. The Captain went 3 for 4 and Mariano closed out the Rays for an 8-4 win, but my mind was racing and by the time we got home around 12PM I knew I would have a tough time sleeping thinking about the days ahead. My father, sensing the need for some wise words and quiet calm, stayed up with me long in to the morning hours before he called it a night on the couch as he would drive back to Massachusetts the following day. I slept about 2 hours before trudging into the office wondering whether or not we would make it to Friday. I share this little story with you now because I we are more than happy to be here to discuss you concerns, offer some thoughtful perspective and ease any jitters. I have not lost any sleep over the last 4-5 nights, neither should you. This is no Lehman Brothers…

P.S. With February CPI report release it will serve as a good distraction and perhaps we can start to pick up the pieces from this mess.

Breakwater Team

At Breakwater Capital, we work with families across the United States, providing each client with a personalized experience tailored to their current circumstances, future goals, and timelines.

Read Other Posts By Breakwater
By Irshad Design Team December 10, 2025
Strategic gifting can reduce estate taxes and help loved ones when they need it most. Discover 2025 gift tax rules, state exemptions, and planning strategies.
By Irshad Design Team December 10, 2025
Most young workers lose thousands in unvested 401(k) matches. Learn the 5 vesting schedule types and how timing job changes can save your retirement.
fed reserve old people playing benga and they control all the money
December 3, 2025
How the Federal Reserve's operations impact finances. Explore the roles of Fed governors, banks, and FOMC—plus what Jerome Powell's policies mean for your money.
three old white men in suits who look like businessmen standing in front of a federal building
November 20, 2025
Learn about the US Federal Reserve System's structure, history, and current leadership. Understand the Fed's dual mandate, FOMC meetings, and how Fed policy decisions impact investors and consumers.
October 13, 2025
Market outlook for Q4 2025: Fed rate cuts and strong earnings fuel gains, but elevated valuations, rising deficits, and speculative bubbles in gold and AI warrant caution. Learn what's ahead for investors.
October 8, 2025
Written by Madeline Barconi If you're one of millions of homeowners with a sub-3% mortgage rate wondering whether to renovate your current home or sell and upgrade to a bigger house, you're facing one of today's most challenging real estate decisions. Remember 2019–2021? We were all baking sourdough, learning TikTok dances, and, oh yeah, locking in 30-year mortgages at rates so low they now feel like unicorn sightings. If you were lucky enough to snag one of those sub-3% loans, congratulations, you basically married the George Clooney of mortgage rates. I’ll be the first to admit: this is something I personally wrestle with. My husband and I bought our house in 2020 with a shiny 2.99% mortgage, and at the time it felt like we hit the jackpot. Fast forward a few years, add our son into the picture (plus all the toys, gear, and chaos that comes with him), and suddenly everything feels… tighter. Now I find myself asking the same questions many of my clients do. Do I really want to give up a 2.99% rate for something closer to 6.25%? Or is it smarter to spend $80,000 on renovations to make this home work for us? And if I do sink that much into upgrades, is it worth it or would it be better spent on a new house entirely? If you’re nodding along, you’re not alone. Let’s break down the trade-offs between renovating vs. moving.  Option 1: Stay and Renovate Your Current Home The Upside The upside of home renovations , you keep that dreamy, low interest rate. (Seriously, people may envy you forever.) Renovating can cost less than moving once you factor in realtor fees, moving costs, elevated utility costs, standard maintenance and those “oops we need all new furniture” moments. You get to customize your home for you, not some random buyer in the future. The Downside The downside of major renovations rarely cost what you think they will (hello, HGTV plot twist). People often spend 20-30% more than what they think they will. Living in a construction zone is… let’s call it “character building.” Not all upgrades add value, hello $40,000 outdoor pizza oven that a future buyer might shrug at. Try not to put more than ~10–15% of your home’s current value into renovations unless you’re planning to stay there for the long haul. Otherwise, you risk over-investing in a property that won’t give you the return you want. Option 2: Sell and Buy Something New The Upside The benefits of selling your home : you get the extra space you actually need, whether that’s another bedroom, a home office that isn’t your closet, or a backyard big enough for the trampoline your kids are begging for. Sometimes starting fresh is easier than trying to rework a space that just doesn’t fit. If your income has grown since you first bought, this might actually be the right time to “trade up” despite the higher mortgage rates. The Downside The downsides of buying a bigger home: interest rates today are… well, let’s just say they aren’t George Clooney. They’re more like that guy from your twenties who your mom referred to as “fine” whenever you told her they were coming over for dinner. Monthly mortgage payments will likely be much higher, not just because of the rate, but because home prices have risen too. Selling and moving is a ton of work (and expensive). Realtors, inspections, movers, cleaning crews, new curtains and furniture, more upkeep, it all adds up. Be honest with yourself about affordability. A bigger house isn’t worth it if it means saying goodbye to vacations, kids’ activities, or simply sleeping at night without financial stress. The Middle Ground: How to actually Decide Between Renovating and Moving At the end of the day, it comes down to your numbers and your priorities. Ask yourself: How much more space do I actually need, and why? Could I make my current home work with a targeted renovation? If I move, can I comfortably afford the new payment including taxes, homeowners insurance (which continues to be one of the stickiest contributors to inflation), and maintenance without derailing my other financial goals? Am I okay with giving up my “unicorn” interest rate for more square footage and convenience? Final Thought You’re not alone if you feel “stuck” between a rock (tiny house) and a hard place (big mortgage). I’m right there with you, debating whether to live through the dust of a renovation or trade in a once-in-a-lifetime mortgage rate for more space and more comfort. The key is not to rush. Run the numbers, think about your long-term goals, and weigh how much joy (and sanity) more space would bring you. Sometimes the answer is obvious, and sometimes it’s just about deciding which kind of pain (financial or construction) you’d rather live with. Either way, the good news is you have options, and knowing the trade-offs is the first step to making the best home buying decision (or not) for you. The views expressed represent the opinions of Breakwater Capital Group as of the date noted and are subject to change. These views are not intended as a forecast, a guarantee of future results, investment recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. The information provided is of a general nature and should not be construed as investment advice or to provide any investment, tax, financial or legal advice or service to any person. The information contained has been compiled from sources deemed reliable, yet accuracy is not guaranteed. Additional information, including management fees and expenses, is provided on our Form ADV Part 2 available upon request or at the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov . Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
By Jeffrey Hanson September 18, 2025
It’s annual enrollment time and for those with a small business or buying health insurance privately or in your state’s marketplace, it’s a wonderful time to revisit whether or not a Health Savings Account is right for you. While many of us are acutely aware of the rising healthcare costs, according to a recent WSJ article the data suggests with an aging (and somewhat unhealthy) population it’s hard to see any relief on the horizon. So, what can you do aside from eating well, exercising and managing stress to limit your trips to the physician’s office and minimize how much money you spend on healthcare each year.  Here is something worth considering. First, let’s define a Health Savings Account (HSA). It is a tax-advantaged savings account designed to help individuals and families save for medical expenses whether for the year ahead, or better, for those expenses they’ll incur later in life. The account itself is paired with a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) which generally carry lower plan premiums as the insured (you) accept a little more of the financial responsibility for visits/treatments than traditional insurance. Here's how an HSA works and some key features:
By Breakwater Team April 28, 2025
Some financial pundits suggest that all you need for financial success is a “set it and forget it” approach with passive index fund investing. While long-term investing is indeed advantageous, is that truly all you need to do? What about tax-saving strategies, generating retirement income, or establishing a solid estate plan? And how should you respond to major life changes or significant market volatility? The simple fact is that managing wealth is complex, especially for high-net-worth individuals. From investment choices to tax planning and business succession, navigating these areas without professional guidance can lead to costly oversights. Partnering with a skilled fiduciary advisor can simplify the process, helping you focus on long-term success while steering clear of potential pitfalls. Breakwater Capital Group provides advanced wealth management solutions rooted in integrity and transparency. Our team of fee-only fiduciary advisors brings clarity and strategic insight to clients across the country.  This article explores the benefits of professional wealth management advice, highlighting the value of a fiduciary advisor who provides comprehensive and personalized financial solutions.
By Breakwater Team April 21, 2025
Spring is a time for renewal—a season to declutter, reorganize, and bring fresh energy into our lives. While cleaning out closets and tidying up your home, why not do the same for your finances? A cluttered financial situation can lead to stress, missed opportunities, and hidden costs that can throw off your long-term plans. Taking the time to organize your finances can help you feel more in control and ready for the future. With over five decades of combined experience, Breakwater Capital Group helps clients nationwide manage their assets, offering personalized guidance through our Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Colorado wealth management offices.  In this blog, we’ll explore why financial organization matters and the key steps you can take to refresh your financial life this spring.
By Breakwater Team April 14, 2025
Imagine you’re preparing for your retirement, anticipating enjoying the fruits of your labor. Then, you notice interest rates changing and fret about its impact on your savings and investments. Understanding these changes is crucial for maintaining the health of your finances.  Monitoring trends in the economy enables you to make smart choices and navigate transitions wisely. Rising and falling interest rates can impact several aspects of planning for your retirement, such as investment performance and the cost of borrowing.