Market Update

Breakwater Team • February 1, 2024

It’s February already, thankfully. The sun seems to be on extended holiday in the Northeast. Perhaps Punxsutawney Phil will be more accurate than economists and strategists alike as this morning he indicated an early Spring is in store. As for us market watchers experiencing something akin to Groundhog’s Day would be nirvana and the first month of the New Year was a continuation of the final two months of 2023. So far, so good for February too. With the S&P logging a return of 1.68% for the month, that annualizes out to a 20% return, ahh, if it were only that easy. There has been a lot to unpack, so we’ll meander across a number of topics to share our thoughts and what we are looking at right now and in the months ahead.



Central Banks: As we have joked about recently, Federal Reserve meetings have become must-see TV. For the last 6 months, since the last hike in July, the meetings have been less about the rate announcement itself and more about trying to get inside Chairman Powell’s thought process. With markets hanging on every word and probing the quarterly Statement of Economic Projections (SEP) for any insights, it’s no surprise that two of the Fed meetings in 2023 corresponded to the most volatile trading days of 2023. The presser earlier this week augured the worst day since September when Powell seemed to take the March cut off the table. Data since then only strengthened the case for May as the lift off date for their easing cycle. That seems to be reasonable enough, in acknowledging that they have come a long way in taming inflation (rolling 6 month PCE is around 2%) they can start to shift focus to the other part of their dual mandate, which is full employment. Bringing both inflation and jobs into a more balanced weighting is a good thing and a far cry from the pain Powell mentioned in August 2022 at Jackson Hole.


While Chair Powell and the Fed are the most important game in town, central banks in the UK, Europe and Japan are worth monitoring. The UK and Europe are dealing with more of the stagflation dynamic we witnessed in the late 70s, though there have been some recent signs of easing inflation. The ongoing impact of higher energy prices has more impact there where they rely heavily on imports and the fact their mortgage rates tend to be much more variable in nature have meant higher monthly payments not just for new buyers but even those who have purchased homes 5 or more years ago. In the States, it’s far more common for borrowers to term out their debt for 30 years. Many folks with a mortgage today have locked in rates of 4% or below. Monetary policy likely will have some impact over the next several years and I would expect the trough of their easing cycle to be below that of what we see in the US. The ECB seems likely to wait for the United States to move first, but they won’t be far behind. Japan has witnessed sustained inflation for the first time in more than 30 years but at a much more palatable level. They have thus far maintained yield curve control policies which suggests that they are in no rush to start raising rates. If they do it’s likely to be modest at best as with households having sizable exposure to the JGBs any drop in price brought on by higher rates may impact consumer behavior. Higher rates would also have some real impact on the carry trade, but that discussion is for another day.


Labor: As the frequency of layoff announcements hitting the headlines have increased over the last 12 months the Fed needs to be very careful about how much softening occurs before it becomes difficult to reverse that trend. Fortunately after a blockbuster January Nonfarm Payroll Report, the unemployment rate ticked back down to 3.7% after rising the prior month albeit slightly to 3.8%. It’s becoming ever more obvious that so goes the labor market so goes the economy. When the unemployment rate jumps by .50% in a short period of time, it’s likely to rise another 1.00% in a hurry as we have seen in prior cycles leading to a recession. Allowing the labor market to get untethered is the quickest path to a hard landing. We have seen new weekly unemployment filings increase to 224,000 in the most recent week and continuing claims remain around 1.8MM. Hardly worrisome levels unless you are one of those impacted, but the direction itself is worth watching. It was good to see job openings surprisingly increase in the most recent JOLTS report and especially in sectors like manufacturing. Another bright spot is that the “quit rate” has dropped sharply since the height of the pandemic where workers bounced to new opportunities at an unprecedented rate speaking to labor tightness. This probably has an added positive effect on productivity as fewer new workers have to adjust to unfamiliar surroundings. Continuing the soft landing narrative the Bureau of Labor Statistics just released their quarterly Employment Cost Index which showed further moderating, which is a good sign when it comes to inflation and margins. Nominal wage growth is around 4% back to levels we saw pre-pandemic.


Inflation: With CPI trending down, and PCE following a similar path perhaps the debate over transitory can be put to rest. The stickier shelter component will start to show signs of disinflation or outright deflation in the coming months as softer housing data and a glut of new multi-family housing comes online. While there has been much hand wringing over financial conditions easing (whether directly or indirectly), there is little evidence that higher asset prices are inflationary when it comes to consumption of goods or services. In the post Global Financial Crisis(GFC) world of Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP) inflation consistently undershot the Fed’s target. I am not convinced this time is different. The situation in the Red Sea is worth monitoring, but that shipping lane has less impact on goods that come into the US versus other countries and the case for strong case for continued globalization means large export driven economies like China, Vietnam, Mexico and increasingly India are able to provide disinflationary if not deflationary pressures at a time when that may not be a bad thing. Consumer sentiment surveys have for the last couple of years suggested inflation expectations had become anchored somewhat higher, but some better responses over the last couple of months are encouraging.


Earnings & Margins: As we are in the midst of 4th quarter earnings it would be best to describe the current numbers as “meh.” Profits are likely to be up quarter over quarter for the second quarter in a row, but have thus far come in lower than estimates going back a few months. Some of that is a byproduct of companies being very cautious and not taking on excess inventory, worried about their end consumer and some margin pressures remain. According to FactSet’s Earnings Insight as of Friday January 26th of the 25% of companies that had reported roughly 70% of companies have beat on both earnings and revenue, below 3 and 5 year averages respectively. This week we have seen some better than expected earnings from names in the Technology, Consumer Discretionary and the Communication Services sectors which have an outsized weighting on the market so the overall numbers are likely to improve but all in all it’s hardly been a blowout quarter. Given present lofty valuations, meaningful moves higher from here will need to be supported by improving earnings growth. While the consensus estimate called for as much as 14% YOY growth for the S&P 500 as recently as last Fall, those numbers have come down now to about 10% for 2024. That figure may still be a bit ambitious with GDP forecasts for the year roughly around 2% and inflation moderating. We know companies have a number of levers to pull to improve earnings from buybacks to layoffs, the former an accounting maneuver while the latter likely having more negative intermediate impact on the economy as a whole, so be careful what we wish for here. The good news is that margin pressures are likely to abate given further improvement in the supply chain, improved productivity and slowing wage growth. We may not see peak margins like we saw in 2021 however they remain historically high which makes sense in a less capital-intensive economy.


Global Economy: As we alluded to the challenge of central banks all around the globe to find that happy balance on policy, it’s safe to assume some positive developments abroad would be a positive for the US economy which has run above trend for the last couple of quarters. While there was hope for an improving China in early 2023 and the possibility of a real slowdown in Europe could be avoided, that was not the case. As China continues to wrestle with a housing crisis that has been going on for nearly 10 years, structural reforms have been delayed as Xi Jinping focuses on the common prosperity initiatives which have hurt markets at home. At this point the base case should assume very little help from China in supporting global growth and that seems to be well priced in. If there is some improvement it would be welcome, though I wouldn’t bank on it. Europe, China’s largest trading partner, sees it’s trajectory far more closely tied to developments in the Middle Kingdom, they may not move in lockstep but it’s unlikely that you’d witness a reacceleration in growth in one and not the other. Fortunately, valuations abroad are far less demanding, though markets likely exceed expectations. The likelihood of lower interest rates and possibly a weaker dollar would be a positive for US investors investing abroad as well as remove some near term headwinds on emerging economies that still very much rely on dollar funding for their credit markets.


In summary, a repeat of the last couple of quarters would be great where it’s been upside surprises for both the economy and the markets here in the US. As inflation continues to head lower, that’s a positive even if growth may have peaked in the 3rd quarter of 2023. Growth above trend (2%+ in real terms) is supportive of the labor market and asset prices and if some of the encouraging data regarding manufacturing is not in fact a false start we could revert back to synchronized global growth like we saw in 2016-2017.


They say we’re young and we don’t know

We won’t find out until we grow

Well I don’t know if all that’s true’

Cause you got me, and baby, I got you

-Sonny & Cher


Get In Touch


Sources: WSJ, Barron’s, Factset, Bloomberg, YCharts, FRED St. Louis Fed, Bureau of Labor Statistics

Breakwater Team

At Breakwater Capital, we work with families across the United States, providing each client with a personalized experience tailored to their current circumstances, future goals, and timelines.

Read Other Posts By Breakwater
October 13, 2025
Market outlook for Q4 2025: Fed rate cuts and strong earnings fuel gains, but elevated valuations, rising deficits, and speculative bubbles in gold and AI warrant caution. Learn what's ahead for investors.
October 8, 2025
Written by Madeline Barconi If you're one of millions of homeowners with a sub-3% mortgage rate wondering whether to renovate your current home or sell and upgrade to a bigger house, you're facing one of today's most challenging real estate decisions. Remember 2019–2021? We were all baking sourdough, learning TikTok dances, and, oh yeah, locking in 30-year mortgages at rates so low they now feel like unicorn sightings. If you were lucky enough to snag one of those sub-3% loans, congratulations, you basically married the George Clooney of mortgage rates. I’ll be the first to admit: this is something I personally wrestle with. My husband and I bought our house in 2020 with a shiny 2.99% mortgage, and at the time it felt like we hit the jackpot. Fast forward a few years, add our son into the picture (plus all the toys, gear, and chaos that comes with him), and suddenly everything feels… tighter. Now I find myself asking the same questions many of my clients do. Do I really want to give up a 2.99% rate for something closer to 6.25%? Or is it smarter to spend $80,000 on renovations to make this home work for us? And if I do sink that much into upgrades, is it worth it or would it be better spent on a new house entirely? If you’re nodding along, you’re not alone. Let’s break down the trade-offs between renovating vs. moving.  Option 1: Stay and Renovate Your Current Home The Upside The upside of home renovations , you keep that dreamy, low interest rate. (Seriously, people may envy you forever.) Renovating can cost less than moving once you factor in realtor fees, moving costs, elevated utility costs, standard maintenance and those “oops we need all new furniture” moments. You get to customize your home for you, not some random buyer in the future. The Downside The downside of major renovations rarely cost what you think they will (hello, HGTV plot twist). People often spend 20-30% more than what they think they will. Living in a construction zone is… let’s call it “character building.” Not all upgrades add value, hello $40,000 outdoor pizza oven that a future buyer might shrug at. Try not to put more than ~10–15% of your home’s current value into renovations unless you’re planning to stay there for the long haul. Otherwise, you risk over-investing in a property that won’t give you the return you want. Option 2: Sell and Buy Something New The Upside The benefits of selling your home : you get the extra space you actually need, whether that’s another bedroom, a home office that isn’t your closet, or a backyard big enough for the trampoline your kids are begging for. Sometimes starting fresh is easier than trying to rework a space that just doesn’t fit. If your income has grown since you first bought, this might actually be the right time to “trade up” despite the higher mortgage rates. The Downside The downsides of buying a bigger home: interest rates today are… well, let’s just say they aren’t George Clooney. They’re more like that guy from your twenties who your mom referred to as “fine” whenever you told her they were coming over for dinner. Monthly mortgage payments will likely be much higher, not just because of the rate, but because home prices have risen too. Selling and moving is a ton of work (and expensive). Realtors, inspections, movers, cleaning crews, new curtains and furniture, more upkeep, it all adds up. Be honest with yourself about affordability. A bigger house isn’t worth it if it means saying goodbye to vacations, kids’ activities, or simply sleeping at night without financial stress. The Middle Ground: How to actually Decide Between Renovating and Moving At the end of the day, it comes down to your numbers and your priorities. Ask yourself: How much more space do I actually need, and why? Could I make my current home work with a targeted renovation? If I move, can I comfortably afford the new payment including taxes, homeowners insurance (which continues to be one of the stickiest contributors to inflation), and maintenance without derailing my other financial goals? Am I okay with giving up my “unicorn” interest rate for more square footage and convenience? Final Thought You’re not alone if you feel “stuck” between a rock (tiny house) and a hard place (big mortgage). I’m right there with you, debating whether to live through the dust of a renovation or trade in a once-in-a-lifetime mortgage rate for more space and more comfort. The key is not to rush. Run the numbers, think about your long-term goals, and weigh how much joy (and sanity) more space would bring you. Sometimes the answer is obvious, and sometimes it’s just about deciding which kind of pain (financial or construction) you’d rather live with. Either way, the good news is you have options, and knowing the trade-offs is the first step to making the best home buying decision (or not) for you. The views expressed represent the opinions of Breakwater Capital Group as of the date noted and are subject to change. These views are not intended as a forecast, a guarantee of future results, investment recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. The information provided is of a general nature and should not be construed as investment advice or to provide any investment, tax, financial or legal advice or service to any person. The information contained has been compiled from sources deemed reliable, yet accuracy is not guaranteed. Additional information, including management fees and expenses, is provided on our Form ADV Part 2 available upon request or at the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov . Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
By Jeffrey Hanson September 18, 2025
It’s annual enrollment time and for those with a small business or buying health insurance privately or in your state’s marketplace, it’s a wonderful time to revisit whether or not a Health Savings Account is right for you. While many of us are acutely aware of the rising healthcare costs, according to a recent WSJ article the data suggests with an aging (and somewhat unhealthy) population it’s hard to see any relief on the horizon. So, what can you do aside from eating well, exercising and managing stress to limit your trips to the physician’s office and minimize how much money you spend on healthcare each year.  Here is something worth considering. First, let’s define a Health Savings Account (HSA). It is a tax-advantaged savings account designed to help individuals and families save for medical expenses whether for the year ahead, or better, for those expenses they’ll incur later in life. The account itself is paired with a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) which generally carry lower plan premiums as the insured (you) accept a little more of the financial responsibility for visits/treatments than traditional insurance. Here's how an HSA works and some key features:
By Breakwater Team April 28, 2025
Some financial pundits suggest that all you need for financial success is a “set it and forget it” approach with passive index fund investing. While long-term investing is indeed advantageous, is that truly all you need to do? What about tax-saving strategies, generating retirement income, or establishing a solid estate plan? And how should you respond to major life changes or significant market volatility? The simple fact is that managing wealth is complex, especially for high-net-worth individuals. From investment choices to tax planning and business succession, navigating these areas without professional guidance can lead to costly oversights. Partnering with a skilled fiduciary advisor can simplify the process, helping you focus on long-term success while steering clear of potential pitfalls. Breakwater Capital Group provides advanced wealth management solutions rooted in integrity and transparency. Our team of fee-only fiduciary advisors brings clarity and strategic insight to clients across the country.  This article explores the benefits of professional wealth management advice, highlighting the value of a fiduciary advisor who provides comprehensive and personalized financial solutions.
By Breakwater Team April 21, 2025
Spring is a time for renewal—a season to declutter, reorganize, and bring fresh energy into our lives. While cleaning out closets and tidying up your home, why not do the same for your finances? A cluttered financial situation can lead to stress, missed opportunities, and hidden costs that can throw off your long-term plans. Taking the time to organize your finances can help you feel more in control and ready for the future. With over five decades of combined experience, Breakwater Capital Group helps clients nationwide manage their assets, offering personalized guidance through our Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Colorado wealth management offices.  In this blog, we’ll explore why financial organization matters and the key steps you can take to refresh your financial life this spring.
By Breakwater Team April 14, 2025
Imagine you’re preparing for your retirement, anticipating enjoying the fruits of your labor. Then, you notice interest rates changing and fret about its impact on your savings and investments. Understanding these changes is crucial for maintaining the health of your finances.  Monitoring trends in the economy enables you to make smart choices and navigate transitions wisely. Rising and falling interest rates can impact several aspects of planning for your retirement, such as investment performance and the cost of borrowing.
By Breakwater Team April 4, 2025
…grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. – Reinhold Niebuhr In a year that had already witnessed a noticeable uptick in volatility compared to the prior two years, the ongoing back and forth regarding looming tariffs, culminated in what has been described by many pundits as some of the most aggressive levies introduced since the 1890s. While the policy announcements themselves have been well telegraphed, the scope and scale are considerably higher than what was expected, as evidenced by the market’s harsh response. Rather than imposing tariffs based on pre-existing trade protections with our counterparties (i.e., existing tariffs, subsidies, or other barriers to entry) the formula to arrive at the tariffs focused more on the trade imbalance between the two nations. As the largest economy in the world, trading with nearly everyone, many of which are much smaller countries/economies, this was ripe for distortion. For those who have been long time followers of President Trump’s beliefs this should come as little surprise, a recent piece in the WSJ captures quotes dating back to the 1980s which share his perspective that the US was drawing the short straw and other nations should have to pay to access our robust and dynamic economy.  Going back to the days of the earliest trade when men roamed the earth hunting for food there has always been some degree of mercantilism whereby one group looks to accumulate power and wealth and protect their own interests, but in the Post World War II era, it’s inarguable that the US has benefited enormously from their embrace of “free trade” and capitalism. Our economy has grown a hundredfold since 1950 when it was approximately $270BB. The naysayers will point out that back then the US accounted for about 50% of global GDP, peak wealth, or about twice what it is today, but that fails to account for the fact that much of the world having fought the theatres of war in both Europe and the Pacific was in ruin and needing to be rebuilt. There is a misconception that both NAFTA (1994) and China’s entry into the World Trade Organization (2001) were the watershed moments leading to the hollowing out of the US’s manufacturing base, but in reality manufacturing employment had been in decline going back to 1950. At its peak US manufacturing workers accounted for about 30-35% of the nonfarm workforce, whereas today that level sits at around 8% where it has hovered for the last 15 years. In 2000 it was just 15% so still very much the minority. This long-term shift in the mix of the US economy where services now account for a disproportionate percentage of GDP and the workforce overall is the result of a far more skilled workforce driving both innovation and productivity. Surely some manufacturing jobs have left based on the focus on corporate profits, but some of the change relates to comparative advantage and inexpensive labor. It’s not to say, that we should look to push all manufacturing to the most “efficient” destination, surely it’s important to maintain control of manufacturing of critical components to defense, information technology or medicine, but it seems unrealistic at best to expect that we can produce enough and at reasonable costs to satisfy our insatiable demand. We are after all only about 5% of the world’s population, though we account for 25% of global GDP. Talk about punching above our weight. Aside from the logistical challenges that reshoring/onshoring pose, not to mention the timeline associated with the payback for such efforts, the willingness or lack thereof on the part of the business and consumers alike beg the question of whether or not it is worth pursuing. Considering our societal tendencies for policy to reverse course every 4-8 years with Washington’s constant changing of the guard which has grown even more partisan in recent years, it’s hard to envision the private sector making these investments where there may be little or no long-term benefit to the majority of stakeholders, mainly consumers and shareholders alike. If we are being intellectually honest, as we have seen with the likes of Amazon, if automation or robotics can do the work better than human beings, who need benefits and breaks, the case for this policy bolstering manufacturing employment seems weak at best. That’s one of the key pillars of the artificial bull case after all. In addition, there is clear evidence that economies which produce a disproportionate amount of goods versus services are much more susceptible to the boom bust cycle as demand for goods themselves is far more cyclical, look no further than Japan and Germany whose export driven economies have largely languished for the last 20 years in the slow growth/no growth period in the aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis. Let’s put all this into context, according to the World Trade Organization as of 2023 the US had a trade weighted tariff rate of 2.2% lower than nearly all countries around the world. For a country that is such a massive importer one might argue the low levels fostered healthy trade relations with some of our key allies and admittedly some frenemies or altogether poor bedfellows. With these sweeping tariffs, some as high as 49%, this marked a significant shift in policy where the aforementioned tariff rates will approach 30%, having a significant and lasting impact on consumers and businesses alike. Whether you want to describe a tariff as something different than a tax seems to be semantics, the added expense is rarely fully eaten by the producer. In the aftermath of the pandemic and the correspondingly high inflation due to excessive fiscal and monetary policy along with supply side disruptions, its doesn’t require too much detective work to know the average American is exhausted or outraged by higher prices. The tariffs will only add to the price at the register unless we all of a sudden find the private sector extraordinarily benevolent, willing for much if not all of the added costs to result in shrinking margins. By now you have surely figured out why there was such a market kerfuffle, but let’s make sure to fully examine why the result was to shave $3 trillion of market value off of US stocks in one day, which supposedly is the equivalent of 5 years’ worth of tariff receipts. First and foremost, despite opening the year with an economy bumping along with real GDP around 2.50% we have seen a sharp decline in the soft data, where surveys from the confidence board and University of Michigan plumb levels we have not seen going back to the pandemic when fears of a severe respiratory infection and 10% unemployment were front of mind. The hard data has been only a little better as labor has held up thus far, but as we have seen in Retails Sales there are signs that the consumer may be tapped out or growing wearier. With GDP likely to be between negative .5% to positive .50% for Q’1 that it’s like slamming on the brakes while driving in the passing lane. No surprise that there may be a real sense of whiplash. As the odds of a recession have risen, something the President himself acknowledges, it’s safe to assume expectations for earnings growth this year and next seem to be slipping away. With valuations stretched, there has been little margin for error and it’s those stocks, some of the most expensive that have felt the impact that much more acutely. This is why we have heard the “Mag 7” referred to as the “Lag 7” here in early 2025. Now you might be thinking this is likely transitory, a word that is making its rounds again after an ill-feted debut to Wall Street vernacular in 2022. If we are in fact, we are likely to see a shift to a more capital-intensive economy, is it reasonable to justify such high multiples which made more sense in an asset light, intangible heavy ecosystem? It seems hard to justify, from this vantage point. Hopefully, we will avert a recession, but that’s not to say it is an all-clear sign for the stock market. Earnings recessions, like that of 2022, may not lead to large scale job losses and disinflation, but increase the prospects for a bear market. There is a risk here that those fat margins whither because of trade frictions and lead to something more pernicious like a repeat of the stagflation episode of the 1970s and early 1980s where higher inflation sucks the oxygen out of the room leaving little room for real growth. So, what is an investor to do… Well for one thing, maintaining discipline in the form of diversification has helped and likely will continue to, with investors who have roughly half of their portfolio in overseas stocks and fixed income, the positive returns in these two areas have been able to offset some of the decline in US stocks. Incorporating other assets like Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPs), gold or real estate may help mitigate the risk somewhat but as we have seen in the past times of market angst correlations often increase, giving the appearance there is no place to hide. Eventually markets will calm down, as the last of the sellers capitulate, though that process can take weeks or even months to play out. I’ll leave you with some quotes from some of the smartest minds on Wall Street to ponder as we head into the weekend. “Sometimes the share price of a firm tells the CEO of that firm nothing about their company they didn’t already know. Other times, the stock market takes on the role of “active informant.” Stock prices predict investment because they provide business managers with useful information about the future. I think now is probably one of those times. -Neil Dutta, Head of Economics, Renaissance Macro “We all know the math: the stock market has historically grown by 10-11% over the long run but only gone up 60-70% of the time. That means it has corrected 30-40% of the time. Surviving those drawdowns is the price of admission.” -Jurrien Timmer, Director of Global Macro at Fidelity Investments “We are a great nation, the leader of the free world. Yet we squander our political power to appease the textile industry in the Carolinas! We should instead be setting a standard or the world by practicing freedom of competition, of trade, and of enterprise that we preach. -Milton Freidman This presentation is not an offer or a solicitation to buy or sell securities. The information contained in this presentation has been compiled from third-party sources and is believed to be reliable; however, its accuracy is not guaranteed and should not be relied upon in any way whatsoever. This presentation may not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice and does not give investment recommendations. Any opinion included in this report constitutes our judgment as of the date of this report and is subject to change without notice. Additional information, including management fees and expenses, is provided on our Form ADV Part 2 available upon request or at the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website, www.adviserinfo.sec.gov. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
By Breakwater Team March 31, 2025
If you’re a business owner, you’ve undoubtedly spent years building your company and made countless sacrifices. Have you considered how your business will transition to new leadership when you’re ready to step aside and pursue other goals? A succession plan can help preserve the value you’ve worked hard to build. Succession planning is not just about who takes over but how the transition happens to ensure the business’s long-term survival. Whether passing ownership to family, employees, or external buyers, it’s wise to have a strategic plan that minimizes disruption and protects your company’s value.  At Breakwater Capital Group , we help business owners develop comprehensive succession plans. With decades of experience, Breakwater is a fee-only fiduciary financial advisory firm serving clients nationwide with wealth management offices in Denver, CO, Paramus, NJ, and Greater Boston, MA. This blog explains why having a succession plan is important, outlines its key components, and shows how Breakwater can assist you in this crucial process.
By Breakwater Team March 31, 2025
Watching the news and seeing sudden drops in stock prices or economic events that threaten your wealth is stressful. Market volatility is becoming more common in today’s fast-paced and interconnected world. However, depending on how you’re invested and what your financial situation is, a volatile market doesn’t automatically spell trouble.  At Breakwater Capital Group , we navigate economic uncertainty with personalized financial planning and investment strategies. As a fee-only fiduciary financial advisory firm, we proudly serve clients nationwide, with wealth management offices in Denver, CO, Paramus, NJ, and Greater Boston, MA. In this blog, we’ll explore what market volatility is, how to be mindful of it, and the strategies Breakwater uses to help clients manage it effectively.
By Breakwater Team March 24, 2025
Every parent wants to give their child the best opportunities in life, and a quality education is a key part of that. However, with college costs rising rapidly, planning ahead has never been more important. Over the past 20 years, tuition and fees at public four-year institutions have more than doubled, making it essential for families to explore various options and develop a savings strategy. At Breakwater Capital Group , our Greater Boston based wealth management team works with individuals and families nationwide to develop financial plans that incorporate college savings while keeping other financial priorities on track.  This guide discusses the rising cost of college, available financial aid, and practical strategies to help Greater Boston parents prepare.