10 Years After the Taper Tantrum, The Bond Market is Having Another Moment

Breakwater Team • October 6, 2023

Your financial plan can weather times like these, make sure your emotions don’t get the best of you.

What started off as a promising year for both stocks and bonds as by the mid-year investors were looking at solid double digit returns for the former and mid-single digit returns for the latter only to see those gains shrink or evaporate altogether over the last 2+ months. There are plenty of theories to explain the sagging performance, but it’s safe to assume that much of this has to do with interest rates both present and expected and how those rates influence asset prices. When we think about interest rates, the tendency for many investors is to focus on Central Bank policy, after all the 8 meetings per year have become something of a spectacle with traders hanging on every word found in the rate decision transcript and as evidenced by the pronounced volatility during the Chairman press conference where he fields questions from the audience of journalists and economists alike. “Fed Funds” as it is generally referred to is overnight rate set by a rotating group of nine voting members which make up the Federal Open Market Committee. This rate is effectively the rate that banks charge one another to borrow excess reserves necessary to meet capital requirements. In simple terms they are, in essence, a floor rate for the economy.  Dating back to the days of Alan Greenspan, who introduced the concept of forward guidance, the Federal Reserve has gone to great lengths to ensure that they telegraph their monetary policy intentions so as not to surprise various market participants and provide a bit of predictability to the credit markets and economy as a whole. Below is a chart from the St. Louis Fed showing Fed funds for the last 70 years or so.

But hasn’t the Fed only raised rates a measly .25% since June, so why so much commotion? As it turns out short-term rates, while awfully important, represent only a modest slice of the fixed income market and better proxy for the bond markets is the 10-year Treasury. Since most investor’s portfolios are comprised of fixed income securities maturing more than a year from now, the 10 year is a better gauge than the Fed Funds rate which today is around 5.33%. Price and yield here are influenced by factors such as basic supply and demand to growth and inflation expectations along with currency strength or weakness and rate differentials to name just a few. If we take a closer look at this rate, you can see it’s been a noisy 2023. At the close of 2022, the 10 Year yield was 3.83%, almost immediately it started drifting lower as concerns about a slowing US economy and the probability of a recession seemed high. The first week of April it touched the 3.29 marking the year low and after a brief retest about a month later started an orderly ascent back to the same 3.8% level by the end of Q’2. If you had been asleep for 6 months you would have assumed it was a quiescent first half of the year, saying nothing of a mini banking crisis. Something changed in the first couple weeks of July when rates jumped nearly 20 basis points (1 basis point equals 1/100th of 1.00%), a large move absent any real economic data that could be considered a catalyst. Thinking that was perhaps a bit of a head fake, rates were back around 3.85-3.90% by the end of July before taking off. August saw rates move higher at one point touching 4.31% only to wrap up the month at 4.09% before, a good size move in a month but nothing out of the ordinary. September was basically a one way ticket as rates seemingly moved higher day after day ending the month at 4.57% a nearly ½ percent move and we have jumped another 20 basis points in the first week of October.



So, what are the root causes and why does this matter aside from the drubbing longer term bonds have taken? To put things into perspective, according to Bloomberg the “long bond” which is the nickname for the 30 year maturity, has dropped nearly 50% in value since 2020, so much for the safety of the full faith and credit of Uncle Sam as that is on par with the decline witnessed in stocks during the Great Financial Crisis. The following are likely culprits behind the rise in yields.

  • Significant budget deficits are being funded with new issuance, the added supply as the result of $1TT deficits is not as easily absorbed by the markets
  • Foreign holders have likely been liquidating holdings to stabilize their currency (Japan) or their economy (China)
  • As evidenced by the Fed’s Statement of Economic Projections (SEP) they see rates higher for longer and the prospects for cutting rates have diminished or been pushed back.
  • The probability of a recession has declined making duration less necessary or appealing.
  • Dysfunctional government calls into question fiscal responsibility warranting higher borrowing costs.
  • Fed Reserve continues to shrink its balance sheet by not reinvesting the principal and interest payments with their massive portfolio amassed over the last 15 years through their aggressive QE programs.


This list is hardly all encompassing, but as investors have been punished for holding bonds, there is a real possibility they could end 2023 in the red marking 3 successive years of declines, their appetite for debt instruments is waning. This feeds into pressure on stocks as the combination of relatively attractive, more predictable, if not safer returns, means justifying current valuations could be a stretch. Couple this with the fact that higher borrowing costs impact margins and profitability and could mean the next recession is more painful as those highly leveraged companies or cyclical companies are forced to make more draconian cuts to their labor forces when demand falls. An interesting recent analog would be the Taper Tantrum back in 2013 when the Fed Chair Ben Bernanke suggested it was possibly time to reduce the bond buying program used in the midst of the aforementioned Financial Crisis. Stocks sold off quickly in response to that announcement with the S&P dropping 10% in the span of 3 weeks and the 10 year jumped swiftly from 2% to 3%. At the risk of being overly technical, the 10 year bonds duration then was over 9 years meaning the 1% move took prices down nearly 10%. Today with higher rates, the duration of bonds is shorter so the increase from 3.80% to 4.80% actually resulted in smaller price decline. In the end, back in 2013 the Fed blinked and continued their bond buying program, inflation was still very low, unemployment nearly 8% and the scars from 2007-2009 still rather fresh allowing them to remain ultra-accommodative, hardly the case today. Perhaps the more helpful way of looking back at that period is to focus on investor reaction which was swift and tied to fear/emotion versus fundamentals, it may be that we are seeing the same thing today. When markets move quickly things may break or the worry that they may break can do wild things to asset prices. One thing seems certain, that with real yields (nominal rates less the rate of perceived future inflation) north of 2%, investors today are being rewarded for owning fixed income more than at any other time in the last 20 years. Only time will tell if this represents a generational buying opportunity or will rates move materially higher offering a better entry point. Acknowledging it’s been a disappointing if not somewhat painful period for those over indexed to bonds, especially of the longer variety, the bond market has its own version of corrections and now appears to be one of those times. It’s clear the 40-year bull market that started in 1982 took its victory lap in 2020, the ensuing bear market will eventually end, just like we saw those green shoots in March 2009.


We’ll close on one very important fact that is important to keep in mind, bonds by and large offer far more certainty than stocks with their stated interest rates and defined maturities. A critical component of any diversified portfolio, it is best not to abandon them after having experienced declines in the last few years. For those looking to be a bit more opportunistic, earlier this year we had highlighted agency bonds, which are mortgage pass throughs, now offer rates north of 6.2% when going out 3+ years, which seems like an ample risk/return tradeoff. Many quality corporate issues and even some fixed to floating preferred stock offerings offer similarly attractive relative value. The result is likely as much as 1% of added return each year, when modeling out future portfolio returns for the next 10 years with common asset allocations like 60:40 or 70:30 (stocks to bonds.)


Sources for this commentary: Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, Reuters, JP Morgan Asset Management

The views expressed represent the opinions of Breakwater Capital Group as of the date noted and are subject to change. These views are not intended as a forecast, a guarantee of future results, investment recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. The information provided is of a general nature and should not be construed as investment advice or to provide any investment, tax, financial or legal advice or service to any person. The information contained has been compiled from sources deemed reliable, yet accuracy is not guaranteed.

Additional information, including management fees and expenses, is provided on our Form ADV Part 2 available upon request or at the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website https://adviserinfo.sec.gov/ Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Breakwater Team

At Breakwater Capital, we work with families across the United States, providing each client with a personalized experience tailored to their current circumstances, future goals, and timelines.

Read Other Posts By Breakwater
October 13, 2025
Market outlook for Q4 2025: Fed rate cuts and strong earnings fuel gains, but elevated valuations, rising deficits, and speculative bubbles in gold and AI warrant caution. Learn what's ahead for investors.
October 8, 2025
Written by Madeline Barconi If you're one of millions of homeowners with a sub-3% mortgage rate wondering whether to renovate your current home or sell and upgrade to a bigger house, you're facing one of today's most challenging real estate decisions. Remember 2019–2021? We were all baking sourdough, learning TikTok dances, and, oh yeah, locking in 30-year mortgages at rates so low they now feel like unicorn sightings. If you were lucky enough to snag one of those sub-3% loans, congratulations, you basically married the George Clooney of mortgage rates. I’ll be the first to admit: this is something I personally wrestle with. My husband and I bought our house in 2020 with a shiny 2.99% mortgage, and at the time it felt like we hit the jackpot. Fast forward a few years, add our son into the picture (plus all the toys, gear, and chaos that comes with him), and suddenly everything feels… tighter. Now I find myself asking the same questions many of my clients do. Do I really want to give up a 2.99% rate for something closer to 6.25%? Or is it smarter to spend $80,000 on renovations to make this home work for us? And if I do sink that much into upgrades, is it worth it or would it be better spent on a new house entirely? If you’re nodding along, you’re not alone. Let’s break down the trade-offs between renovating vs. moving.  Option 1: Stay and Renovate Your Current Home The Upside The upside of home renovations , you keep that dreamy, low interest rate. (Seriously, people may envy you forever.) Renovating can cost less than moving once you factor in realtor fees, moving costs, elevated utility costs, standard maintenance and those “oops we need all new furniture” moments. You get to customize your home for you, not some random buyer in the future. The Downside The downside of major renovations rarely cost what you think they will (hello, HGTV plot twist). People often spend 20-30% more than what they think they will. Living in a construction zone is… let’s call it “character building.” Not all upgrades add value, hello $40,000 outdoor pizza oven that a future buyer might shrug at. Try not to put more than ~10–15% of your home’s current value into renovations unless you’re planning to stay there for the long haul. Otherwise, you risk over-investing in a property that won’t give you the return you want. Option 2: Sell and Buy Something New The Upside The benefits of selling your home : you get the extra space you actually need, whether that’s another bedroom, a home office that isn’t your closet, or a backyard big enough for the trampoline your kids are begging for. Sometimes starting fresh is easier than trying to rework a space that just doesn’t fit. If your income has grown since you first bought, this might actually be the right time to “trade up” despite the higher mortgage rates. The Downside The downsides of buying a bigger home: interest rates today are… well, let’s just say they aren’t George Clooney. They’re more like that guy from your twenties who your mom referred to as “fine” whenever you told her they were coming over for dinner. Monthly mortgage payments will likely be much higher, not just because of the rate, but because home prices have risen too. Selling and moving is a ton of work (and expensive). Realtors, inspections, movers, cleaning crews, new curtains and furniture, more upkeep, it all adds up. Be honest with yourself about affordability. A bigger house isn’t worth it if it means saying goodbye to vacations, kids’ activities, or simply sleeping at night without financial stress. The Middle Ground: How to actually Decide Between Renovating and Moving At the end of the day, it comes down to your numbers and your priorities. Ask yourself: How much more space do I actually need, and why? Could I make my current home work with a targeted renovation? If I move, can I comfortably afford the new payment including taxes, homeowners insurance (which continues to be one of the stickiest contributors to inflation), and maintenance without derailing my other financial goals? Am I okay with giving up my “unicorn” interest rate for more square footage and convenience? Final Thought You’re not alone if you feel “stuck” between a rock (tiny house) and a hard place (big mortgage). I’m right there with you, debating whether to live through the dust of a renovation or trade in a once-in-a-lifetime mortgage rate for more space and more comfort. The key is not to rush. Run the numbers, think about your long-term goals, and weigh how much joy (and sanity) more space would bring you. Sometimes the answer is obvious, and sometimes it’s just about deciding which kind of pain (financial or construction) you’d rather live with. Either way, the good news is you have options, and knowing the trade-offs is the first step to making the best home buying decision (or not) for you. The views expressed represent the opinions of Breakwater Capital Group as of the date noted and are subject to change. These views are not intended as a forecast, a guarantee of future results, investment recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. The information provided is of a general nature and should not be construed as investment advice or to provide any investment, tax, financial or legal advice or service to any person. The information contained has been compiled from sources deemed reliable, yet accuracy is not guaranteed. Additional information, including management fees and expenses, is provided on our Form ADV Part 2 available upon request or at the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov . Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
By Jeffrey Hanson September 18, 2025
It’s annual enrollment time and for those with a small business or buying health insurance privately or in your state’s marketplace, it’s a wonderful time to revisit whether or not a Health Savings Account is right for you. While many of us are acutely aware of the rising healthcare costs, according to a recent WSJ article the data suggests with an aging (and somewhat unhealthy) population it’s hard to see any relief on the horizon. So, what can you do aside from eating well, exercising and managing stress to limit your trips to the physician’s office and minimize how much money you spend on healthcare each year.  Here is something worth considering. First, let’s define a Health Savings Account (HSA). It is a tax-advantaged savings account designed to help individuals and families save for medical expenses whether for the year ahead, or better, for those expenses they’ll incur later in life. The account itself is paired with a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) which generally carry lower plan premiums as the insured (you) accept a little more of the financial responsibility for visits/treatments than traditional insurance. Here's how an HSA works and some key features:
By Breakwater Team April 28, 2025
Some financial pundits suggest that all you need for financial success is a “set it and forget it” approach with passive index fund investing. While long-term investing is indeed advantageous, is that truly all you need to do? What about tax-saving strategies, generating retirement income, or establishing a solid estate plan? And how should you respond to major life changes or significant market volatility? The simple fact is that managing wealth is complex, especially for high-net-worth individuals. From investment choices to tax planning and business succession, navigating these areas without professional guidance can lead to costly oversights. Partnering with a skilled fiduciary advisor can simplify the process, helping you focus on long-term success while steering clear of potential pitfalls. Breakwater Capital Group provides advanced wealth management solutions rooted in integrity and transparency. Our team of fee-only fiduciary advisors brings clarity and strategic insight to clients across the country.  This article explores the benefits of professional wealth management advice, highlighting the value of a fiduciary advisor who provides comprehensive and personalized financial solutions.
By Breakwater Team April 21, 2025
Spring is a time for renewal—a season to declutter, reorganize, and bring fresh energy into our lives. While cleaning out closets and tidying up your home, why not do the same for your finances? A cluttered financial situation can lead to stress, missed opportunities, and hidden costs that can throw off your long-term plans. Taking the time to organize your finances can help you feel more in control and ready for the future. With over five decades of combined experience, Breakwater Capital Group helps clients nationwide manage their assets, offering personalized guidance through our Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Colorado wealth management offices.  In this blog, we’ll explore why financial organization matters and the key steps you can take to refresh your financial life this spring.
By Breakwater Team April 14, 2025
Imagine you’re preparing for your retirement, anticipating enjoying the fruits of your labor. Then, you notice interest rates changing and fret about its impact on your savings and investments. Understanding these changes is crucial for maintaining the health of your finances.  Monitoring trends in the economy enables you to make smart choices and navigate transitions wisely. Rising and falling interest rates can impact several aspects of planning for your retirement, such as investment performance and the cost of borrowing.
By Breakwater Team April 4, 2025
…grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. – Reinhold Niebuhr In a year that had already witnessed a noticeable uptick in volatility compared to the prior two years, the ongoing back and forth regarding looming tariffs, culminated in what has been described by many pundits as some of the most aggressive levies introduced since the 1890s. While the policy announcements themselves have been well telegraphed, the scope and scale are considerably higher than what was expected, as evidenced by the market’s harsh response. Rather than imposing tariffs based on pre-existing trade protections with our counterparties (i.e., existing tariffs, subsidies, or other barriers to entry) the formula to arrive at the tariffs focused more on the trade imbalance between the two nations. As the largest economy in the world, trading with nearly everyone, many of which are much smaller countries/economies, this was ripe for distortion. For those who have been long time followers of President Trump’s beliefs this should come as little surprise, a recent piece in the WSJ captures quotes dating back to the 1980s which share his perspective that the US was drawing the short straw and other nations should have to pay to access our robust and dynamic economy.  Going back to the days of the earliest trade when men roamed the earth hunting for food there has always been some degree of mercantilism whereby one group looks to accumulate power and wealth and protect their own interests, but in the Post World War II era, it’s inarguable that the US has benefited enormously from their embrace of “free trade” and capitalism. Our economy has grown a hundredfold since 1950 when it was approximately $270BB. The naysayers will point out that back then the US accounted for about 50% of global GDP, peak wealth, or about twice what it is today, but that fails to account for the fact that much of the world having fought the theatres of war in both Europe and the Pacific was in ruin and needing to be rebuilt. There is a misconception that both NAFTA (1994) and China’s entry into the World Trade Organization (2001) were the watershed moments leading to the hollowing out of the US’s manufacturing base, but in reality manufacturing employment had been in decline going back to 1950. At its peak US manufacturing workers accounted for about 30-35% of the nonfarm workforce, whereas today that level sits at around 8% where it has hovered for the last 15 years. In 2000 it was just 15% so still very much the minority. This long-term shift in the mix of the US economy where services now account for a disproportionate percentage of GDP and the workforce overall is the result of a far more skilled workforce driving both innovation and productivity. Surely some manufacturing jobs have left based on the focus on corporate profits, but some of the change relates to comparative advantage and inexpensive labor. It’s not to say, that we should look to push all manufacturing to the most “efficient” destination, surely it’s important to maintain control of manufacturing of critical components to defense, information technology or medicine, but it seems unrealistic at best to expect that we can produce enough and at reasonable costs to satisfy our insatiable demand. We are after all only about 5% of the world’s population, though we account for 25% of global GDP. Talk about punching above our weight. Aside from the logistical challenges that reshoring/onshoring pose, not to mention the timeline associated with the payback for such efforts, the willingness or lack thereof on the part of the business and consumers alike beg the question of whether or not it is worth pursuing. Considering our societal tendencies for policy to reverse course every 4-8 years with Washington’s constant changing of the guard which has grown even more partisan in recent years, it’s hard to envision the private sector making these investments where there may be little or no long-term benefit to the majority of stakeholders, mainly consumers and shareholders alike. If we are being intellectually honest, as we have seen with the likes of Amazon, if automation or robotics can do the work better than human beings, who need benefits and breaks, the case for this policy bolstering manufacturing employment seems weak at best. That’s one of the key pillars of the artificial bull case after all. In addition, there is clear evidence that economies which produce a disproportionate amount of goods versus services are much more susceptible to the boom bust cycle as demand for goods themselves is far more cyclical, look no further than Japan and Germany whose export driven economies have largely languished for the last 20 years in the slow growth/no growth period in the aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis. Let’s put all this into context, according to the World Trade Organization as of 2023 the US had a trade weighted tariff rate of 2.2% lower than nearly all countries around the world. For a country that is such a massive importer one might argue the low levels fostered healthy trade relations with some of our key allies and admittedly some frenemies or altogether poor bedfellows. With these sweeping tariffs, some as high as 49%, this marked a significant shift in policy where the aforementioned tariff rates will approach 30%, having a significant and lasting impact on consumers and businesses alike. Whether you want to describe a tariff as something different than a tax seems to be semantics, the added expense is rarely fully eaten by the producer. In the aftermath of the pandemic and the correspondingly high inflation due to excessive fiscal and monetary policy along with supply side disruptions, its doesn’t require too much detective work to know the average American is exhausted or outraged by higher prices. The tariffs will only add to the price at the register unless we all of a sudden find the private sector extraordinarily benevolent, willing for much if not all of the added costs to result in shrinking margins. By now you have surely figured out why there was such a market kerfuffle, but let’s make sure to fully examine why the result was to shave $3 trillion of market value off of US stocks in one day, which supposedly is the equivalent of 5 years’ worth of tariff receipts. First and foremost, despite opening the year with an economy bumping along with real GDP around 2.50% we have seen a sharp decline in the soft data, where surveys from the confidence board and University of Michigan plumb levels we have not seen going back to the pandemic when fears of a severe respiratory infection and 10% unemployment were front of mind. The hard data has been only a little better as labor has held up thus far, but as we have seen in Retails Sales there are signs that the consumer may be tapped out or growing wearier. With GDP likely to be between negative .5% to positive .50% for Q’1 that it’s like slamming on the brakes while driving in the passing lane. No surprise that there may be a real sense of whiplash. As the odds of a recession have risen, something the President himself acknowledges, it’s safe to assume expectations for earnings growth this year and next seem to be slipping away. With valuations stretched, there has been little margin for error and it’s those stocks, some of the most expensive that have felt the impact that much more acutely. This is why we have heard the “Mag 7” referred to as the “Lag 7” here in early 2025. Now you might be thinking this is likely transitory, a word that is making its rounds again after an ill-feted debut to Wall Street vernacular in 2022. If we are in fact, we are likely to see a shift to a more capital-intensive economy, is it reasonable to justify such high multiples which made more sense in an asset light, intangible heavy ecosystem? It seems hard to justify, from this vantage point. Hopefully, we will avert a recession, but that’s not to say it is an all-clear sign for the stock market. Earnings recessions, like that of 2022, may not lead to large scale job losses and disinflation, but increase the prospects for a bear market. There is a risk here that those fat margins whither because of trade frictions and lead to something more pernicious like a repeat of the stagflation episode of the 1970s and early 1980s where higher inflation sucks the oxygen out of the room leaving little room for real growth. So, what is an investor to do… Well for one thing, maintaining discipline in the form of diversification has helped and likely will continue to, with investors who have roughly half of their portfolio in overseas stocks and fixed income, the positive returns in these two areas have been able to offset some of the decline in US stocks. Incorporating other assets like Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPs), gold or real estate may help mitigate the risk somewhat but as we have seen in the past times of market angst correlations often increase, giving the appearance there is no place to hide. Eventually markets will calm down, as the last of the sellers capitulate, though that process can take weeks or even months to play out. I’ll leave you with some quotes from some of the smartest minds on Wall Street to ponder as we head into the weekend. “Sometimes the share price of a firm tells the CEO of that firm nothing about their company they didn’t already know. Other times, the stock market takes on the role of “active informant.” Stock prices predict investment because they provide business managers with useful information about the future. I think now is probably one of those times. -Neil Dutta, Head of Economics, Renaissance Macro “We all know the math: the stock market has historically grown by 10-11% over the long run but only gone up 60-70% of the time. That means it has corrected 30-40% of the time. Surviving those drawdowns is the price of admission.” -Jurrien Timmer, Director of Global Macro at Fidelity Investments “We are a great nation, the leader of the free world. Yet we squander our political power to appease the textile industry in the Carolinas! We should instead be setting a standard or the world by practicing freedom of competition, of trade, and of enterprise that we preach. -Milton Freidman This presentation is not an offer or a solicitation to buy or sell securities. The information contained in this presentation has been compiled from third-party sources and is believed to be reliable; however, its accuracy is not guaranteed and should not be relied upon in any way whatsoever. This presentation may not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice and does not give investment recommendations. Any opinion included in this report constitutes our judgment as of the date of this report and is subject to change without notice. Additional information, including management fees and expenses, is provided on our Form ADV Part 2 available upon request or at the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website, www.adviserinfo.sec.gov. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
By Breakwater Team March 31, 2025
If you’re a business owner, you’ve undoubtedly spent years building your company and made countless sacrifices. Have you considered how your business will transition to new leadership when you’re ready to step aside and pursue other goals? A succession plan can help preserve the value you’ve worked hard to build. Succession planning is not just about who takes over but how the transition happens to ensure the business’s long-term survival. Whether passing ownership to family, employees, or external buyers, it’s wise to have a strategic plan that minimizes disruption and protects your company’s value.  At Breakwater Capital Group , we help business owners develop comprehensive succession plans. With decades of experience, Breakwater is a fee-only fiduciary financial advisory firm serving clients nationwide with wealth management offices in Denver, CO, Paramus, NJ, and Greater Boston, MA. This blog explains why having a succession plan is important, outlines its key components, and shows how Breakwater can assist you in this crucial process.
By Breakwater Team March 31, 2025
Watching the news and seeing sudden drops in stock prices or economic events that threaten your wealth is stressful. Market volatility is becoming more common in today’s fast-paced and interconnected world. However, depending on how you’re invested and what your financial situation is, a volatile market doesn’t automatically spell trouble.  At Breakwater Capital Group , we navigate economic uncertainty with personalized financial planning and investment strategies. As a fee-only fiduciary financial advisory firm, we proudly serve clients nationwide, with wealth management offices in Denver, CO, Paramus, NJ, and Greater Boston, MA. In this blog, we’ll explore what market volatility is, how to be mindful of it, and the strategies Breakwater uses to help clients manage it effectively.
By Breakwater Team March 24, 2025
Every parent wants to give their child the best opportunities in life, and a quality education is a key part of that. However, with college costs rising rapidly, planning ahead has never been more important. Over the past 20 years, tuition and fees at public four-year institutions have more than doubled, making it essential for families to explore various options and develop a savings strategy. At Breakwater Capital Group , our Greater Boston based wealth management team works with individuals and families nationwide to develop financial plans that incorporate college savings while keeping other financial priorities on track.  This guide discusses the rising cost of college, available financial aid, and practical strategies to help Greater Boston parents prepare.